By Dave Ulrich • firstname.lastname@example.org • Co-Founder, The RBL Group, Norm Smallwood • email@example.com • Co-Founder, The RBL Group and Alan Todd • firstname.lastname@example.org • Founder, CorpU
We know it matters. Some go to war for it. Professional sports teams draft for it. Actors and musicians audition to show they have it. Others consider it the ultimate solution and try to manage it. Agents contract for it. Organizations build plans to leverage it. Some are innately endowed with it while others strive diligently to earn it. All try to grow it. Talent.
Talent (called workforce, individual competence, skills, expertise/know-how, synonym for employees, and so forth) has been the hallmark of HR for decades. A multitude of programs and initiatives and untold millions have been invested to attract, retain, and upgrade talent. Yet, how do business and HR leaders know which talent initiatives deliver results?
We have spent the last 18 months creating an Organization Guidance System that informs the impact of four Organization Effectiveness pathways on five key results (see Figure 1);
In this article, we report the findings of our pilot study about which talent initiatives drive key outcomes (cells 1,5,9,13).
Step 1: Identify and measure key outcomes
Prioritizing talent initiatives starts with identifying desired results. The columns in Figure 1 suggest five stakeholder results that a company may prioritize  employee (well-being, competence),  business strategy (differentiated position, ability to execute),  customer (net promoter score),  investor/financial (profitability), and  social citizenship (environmental, social). Instead of talking about an innovative talent initiative, HR professionals should start talent discussions by identifying desired results that matter to business leaders.
Step 2: Distill and measure key talent initiatives.
There are innumerable initiatives that could be done to improve talent. In our talent research and work, we identify three major talent domains (competence, commitment, and contribution or experience). Within each of these three domains, we identify a number of talent initiatives. For example, in the book Talent Accelerator we identify 13 talent initiatives to increase competence; in our engagement research, we identify 7 practices that make up VOI2C2E (Vision, Opportunity, Incentives, Impact, Community, Communication, and Entrepreneurship); and in Why of Work we identify 7 practices to increase contribution or experience.
Based on this work, we identify 18 talent initiatives we can assess. From our pilot study, we determined that these 18 talent initiatives could be distilled into 9 initiatives that an organization could invest in (see Figure 2). We created a 36-item index (4 items for each of the nine initiatives) to determine the extent to which each of the nine talent initiatives exist in an organization.
Step 3: Report status of talent challenges
We collected data on how well an organization performs on these nine talent initiatives (see Figure 3). This figure reports the overall mean (column A), variance (column B), and reliability (column C) of the measures of these nine initiatives.
This figure indicates which of the 9 initiatives are better done (positive employee experience (#9) and communication (#5)) and which score lower (retaining employees (#6). The results also confirm that these are valid measures of the nine dimensions.
Most talent research ends by showing global averages and comparing them to the scores in column A.
Step 4: Report guidance on talent practices
To move from these talent descriptions (Figure 3) to prescriptions, we offer guidance in Figure 4. This figure shows the relative impact of each of the 9 initiatives (rows) on four outcomes we measured in the pilot (columns B, C, D, and E). We used proprietary analytics (variance decomposition) to understand how different talent initiatives will deliver different results (note: in the pilot, we focused on 4 results; we now have added a fifth, social citizenship).
The findings in Figure 4 dramatically shift the discussion of talent from what is done to what should be done. Some findings include:
- In general, the talent activities with the most overall impact on results are acquiring the right people and tracking their employee engagement. The overall least impact is removing people.
- Employee results increase the most through tracking employee sentiment and managing performance.
- Business strategy results are most accomplished through acquiring the right people and tracking their engagement.
- Customer results are most impacted by tracking employee engagement, communicating with employees, retaining the best employees, and acquiring the right employees.
- Financial results are most impacted by developing employees, acquiring employees, and managing careers and succession.
The implications of this talent guidance are profound. Depending on the results an organization seeks, business and HR leaders can now provide guidance on where to focus talent initiatives. In Figure 1, we show four pathways (talent, leadership, organization, and HR). We will report the pilot results of these other three pathways in subsequent posts.
This OGS is FREE to anyone. Simply visit www.rbl.ai to get started.
Dave Ulrich is the Rensis Likert Professor at the Ross School of Business, University of Michigan and a partner at The RBL Group, a consulting firm focused on helping organizations and leaders deliver value.